The Chamber of Deputies was unable to debate a bill this Monday that seeks to exclude those convicted of crimes against humanity from presidential pardons. The initiative, which was fourth on the parliamentary agenda, has been postponed for a future vote.
Although the matter did not reach a vote, the delay has reignited political debate regarding the Executive Branch's authority to grant benefits in cases involving human rights violations. The bill specifically targets inmates at the Punta Peuco prison.
The proposal currently faces an unfavorable report after being rejected by the Constitutional Committee. However, Representative Lorena Fries, the bill's sponsor, intends to defend the report to ensure guarantees against the repetition of such crimes in the country.
Clashing Positions
Representing the Frente Amplio party, Representative Ana María Gazmuri of Acción Humanista backed the measure, demanding full respect for the Rome Statute. She joined Fries in the call to prevent those responsible for crimes against humanity from benefiting from presidential clemency.
On the opposing side, Renovación Nacional Representative Ximena Ossandón stated that her party seeks to abolish the practice of pardons altogether. She suggested that such requests should be reviewed by a committee of experts to avoid infringing upon the distinct powers of the various branches of government.
Meanwhile, the Government's stance on the use of this prerogative remains uncertain. Government Spokesperson Mara Sedini stated that the Executive Branch is continuing to analyze submitted requests and that the end of pardons could become a topic of discussion in the future.
The bill must be returned to the legislative agenda for further analysis, as the Executive Branch decides whether it will exercise its power to pardon those convicted of crimes against humanity.